![]() 2 Hence (plus some playful spirit) the title of this paper.1 It is of course controversial whether, when it comes to accounting theoretically for the role of th (.).Aware that if I am not already a full-fledged internal legal positivist that I at least feel very close to it, I believe this could be a good exercise in measuring our proximities. ![]() Hopefully, this exercise will also allow me to gauge my own stance regarding internal legal positivism. ![]() ![]() In it, Redondo manages to address a large part of the most pressing controversies in current legal philosophy, discussing them with dedication and carving a path by connecting them together toward a metatheoretical model, which can seriously claim to be original and novel.Ģ Given the impossibility of tacking the full breadth and scope of the themes and discussions Redondo analyzes, in the following I concentrate on disputing the central claim of her book. It is a highly stimulating book, meticulously argued, yet never tiresome or excessively hard to follow. 1 Definitely: hurrah! Positivismo jurídico “interno,” by Cristina Redondo, is a milestone in the analytic legal (meta)theory of this century. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |